ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsChanges Coming to Divisional Application Practice in Europe
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Christopher P. Singer -- One of our European associates, Forresters, alerted us today about change to Rule 36 EPC that was enacted on March 26, 2009 by the EPO Administrative Council. The rule change is expected to limit the opportunities for divisional application filings in Europe, relative to the current rule, in an effort to curtail the current "abusive" practice of divisional application filing in Europe. Forresters' website has posted an announcement with an overview of how the new rule is likely to impact divisional practice. Briefly, the changed rule now features a two year window provision within which...Full post as published by Patent Docs on March 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Visa Applications For Foreign Nationals Married to American Citizens
two options for getting your foreign-born spouse a visa
Stacy Schneider
Stacy Schneider offers to be Britney Spears Lawyer for Free
Lawsuits and Settlements
Citizenship and Immigration Canada
allegedly overcharged for immigration application fees.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

EP Divisional Applications - the new 2 year rule
EP Divisional Applications: some food for thought
Restricted-Out Claims Not Eligible for Priority in Later CIP Application
Is being pro-active a good thing
Ontario Divisional Court Judgments







