ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: IPBiz

To Arnold: we are not jealous; CIRM is all yours!

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
Californiastemcellreport, in a post titled California Governor Says Invitrogen and Biotech Leading The Way , has a quote attributed to California's governor Schwarzenegger about the view of others toward California's Proposition 71 / CIRM:

The governor cited the $3 billion stem cell agency and its three-year-old grant program, the largest research effort for human embryonic stem cell research in the world.

"The rest of the world is somewhat jealous," he said.

Schwarzenegger added, "It's all about job creation."

IPBiz noted to californiastemcellreport and Schwarzenegger: We are not jealous. Our feeling is "better you than us." In a period of a bad economy, giving a few expensive jobs to researchers is not the job creation that will really help. IPBiz is more concerned about the "false pretenses" passed off on California Proposition 71voters concerning patent royalties. That now seems to be "gone with the wind."

Of Schwarzenegger choosing Invitrogen as his "poster child," those familiar with IPBiz will recall a few posts about Invitrogen, which is quite willing to strongly enforce the patents of Invitrogen. See for example:

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-rhetoric-in-warf-v-cirm-battle.html

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-on-warf-cirm-conflict-in-research.html

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/stratagene-loses-jury-verdict-to.html

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2005/12/invitrogen-wins-against-clontech-at.html

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2005/10/district-court-reversed-in-invitrogen.html

In this simplistic view of the world, the patents of Invitrogen are "good" patents, but the patents of others, such as those of Thomsen / WARF are "bad" patents. Hmmm, sort of reminds one of the IT backers of patent reform, doesn't it?

Full post as published by IPBiz on February 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0026 secs (from cache 10/31/26 23:25:01)