ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Bookmark Follow Me Email to a friend

Patent Law

: Patent Troll Tracker

Acacia December 2007 Update

By Troll Tracker

Turning to our busiest patent troll in 2007, Acacia, it kept up momentum in December with new lawsuits.

Acacia's new subsidiary Coronary Stent Visualization Corp., established in Delaware on 11/19/07 with a principal place of business of 500 Newport Center Drive, 7th Floor, Newport Beach, CA, filed a lawsuit less than a month after formation. Acacia sued Philips Electronic North America Corp. on 3 patents owned by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles) and allegedly exclusively licensed to Acacia. The exclusive license likely happened at some point just prior to February 2007, when Cedars-Sinai (represented by Jones Day-LA) told the PTO it had lost its small entity status. The 3 patents are 5,054,045; 5,457,728; and 5,822,391. The lawsuit, involving a Los Angeles patentee, Los Angeles inventors, a Los Angeles exclusive licensee/plaintiff, a Los Angeles prosecuting attorney/law firm (well, now-defunct Lyon & Lyon, anyway), and a New York defendant, was filed in Marshall, Texas on 12/17/07 by DiNovo Price Ellwanger of Austin.

Acacia also filed a big case on December 4, in the Southern District of Illinois (East St. Louis) - the second case they have filed there. This time the sub was Document Generation Corp., and Acacia used Simon Passanante of St. Louis. Patent asserted was 5,148,366. Again, Acacia said it is only the exclusive licensee. 19 defendants were sued, all in the medical software field. GE Healthcare and McKesson are the big ones, but 17 small-to-medium business were sued, too:

1. AllMeds, Inc. (Tennessee-based corporation)
2. Allscripts, LLC (Chicago, Illinois)
3. Cerner Corp. (Missouri)
4. Healthport, Inc. (South Carolina)
5. eClinicalWorks, LLC (Massachusetts)
6. Sage Software Healthcare, Inc. (Florida)
7. AMT Solutions, Inc. (Texas)
8. iMedica Corp. (California - Northern)
9. McKesson Corp. (California - Northern)
10. MediNotes Corp. (Iowa)
11. Misys Healthcare Systems, LLC (North Carolina)
12. NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, Inc. (Pennsylvania)
13. Noteworthy Medical Systems, Inc. (Ohio - Northern)
14. Infor-Med Medical Information Systems, inc. (California - Central)
15. Pulse Systems, Inc. (Kansas)
16. SSIMED, LLC (Connecticut)
17. Physician Micro Systems, Inc. (Washington)
18. A4 Health Systems, Inc. (Chicago, Illinois)
19. GE Healthcare (New Jersey)

So, let's get this straight. Acacia, a California company located in CDCA, is an exclusive licensee who has sued 19 defendants, who are located in 17 different judicial districts (including CDCA). The original assignee and inventors were all from Minnesota, then the patent was transferred via merger and relocation to a company in the Southern District of Ohio, and finally has ended up with I-Think, LLC, an Ann Arbor Michigan corporation which appears to be a subsidiary of the original Minnesota assignee, now called DocuMed. That's about 20 different judicial districts that make sense in terms of venue, yet Acacia chose the Southern District of Illinois. Why, exactly? What's in East St. Louis that appeals to Acacia?

According to this website, DocuMed itself has only 2 employees, one of which is presumably the VP, Secretary and Treasurer of I-Think, Douglas Kassab. This looks like a once-company, looking for a cashout before one of its remaining assets, a patent that expires in 22 months, is no longer useful.

Back tomorrow with some highlights of the last couple of weeks in the Eastern District of Texas.

Full post as published by Patent Troll Tracker on January 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Bulletins

Related Law Articles

Related Law Questions

Lawsuits and Settlements


















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource









Click here






Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











Click here
0.2529 secs