ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Paralegals & Legal Secretaries Blogs -> Practical Paralegalism

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Paralegals & Legal Secretaries

: Practical Paralegalism

Here's Why "No JDs Need Apply" for that Paralegal Job

By Lynne DeVenny

ADVERTISEMENTS
Or, How Not to Get a Job in the Legal Field. Ever.

Ya'll know I'm a fan of paralegal want ads gone awry, and welcome tips from readers. And sometimes I blog about law school graduates applying for the same legal support staff positions we do.

But lately I've noticed a trend in paralegal want ads which state, "No JDs please" or "No JDs need apply." A recent post from Above the Law, "A Mass. Lawyer You Don't Want to Work For and a Law Student You Don't Want to Hire," may provide a clue as to why law firms are suddenly specifically excluding lawyers from applying for paralegal positions.

In a nutshell, a Massachusetts law student saw an ad for a paralegal on Craigslist and applied for the job. He advanced to an interview, which apparently went swimmingly, with the female attorney seriously considering him for the job - but asking for a month's test run.

For many paralegals who've been unsuccessfully looking for work for a long time, getting offered a trial run might have been a step in the right direction.

But in this case, the request for a probationary period did not go over well, and an increasingly acrimonious email exchange (also known as a "digital hot mess") ensued - with neither party apparently willing to let the other have the last word. The relationship turned about as sour as one can get between two professed "colleagues" (their word, not mine), with excerpts from their emails eventually appearing on one of the most widely read blawgs on the planet.

Published gems included:

If your [sic] not happy with your secretary, then deal with it one on one with her. Why would you think that I or anyone else would want to get involved with your internal affairs. What next? Do you want me to kiss your feet her Royal Highness?

You need to read the post and see the video (fodder for a whole separate post on why legal professionals should not "get stuff off their chests" on YouTube) for yourself. But they've got everything for the requisite pot-boiler: grammar snipes, secretly-shopped employees, misogyny, our founding fathers - and camera angles that made me a wee tad motion sick.

The good news for paralegals is that there could be a whole lot more "No JDs need apply" in future job postings...

P.S. Take it from an experienced litigation paralegal, shooting from the hip with your Blackberry can really come back to haunt you.

Sources: Above the Law; The Docket

Related Posts: For a Good Time, Read Paralegal Want Ads on Craigslist; Don't Throw People Under the Bus

Full post as published by Practical Paralegalism on May 31, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/04/26 12:01:08)