Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ohio Blogs -> Cincinnati Law Library Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ohio
: Cincinnati Law Library BlogOhio "firearm provision" not separate offense
By Chuck Kallendorf
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Ohio Supreme Court this morning held that the "firearm specification" provision of state law that adds three years to the prison sentence of an offender who uses a firearm in the commission of a felony does not charge the defendant with a separate criminal offense. The state's allied offenses of similar import statute (R.C. 2941.25), therefore, does not require the firearm specification andFull post as published by Cincinnati Law Library Blog on February 24, 2011 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Ohio Health Centers
Ohio Health Centers Sued for Improper Billing
Ohio Drinking Water
Contaminated with Acid
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
Merrill Lynch
Agrees a $475 Million Settlement with Ohio Teachers
Unclaimed $14 Million Settlement
Ohio Charities to Benefit
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Julian: 924(j) does not require consecutive sentences
Alexander: Firing Firearm from Vehicle is "Crime of Violence"
Gun On Person Possessed "In Connection With" Simple Possession Felony
Possessing Unregistered Gun Not a Crime of Violence Under 924(c)(1)
Sup. Ct. reaffirms that use of machinegun is an element, not a sentencing factor








