Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ohio Blogs -> Cleveland Law Library Weblog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ohio
: Cleveland Law Library WeblogExculpatory or Not, Judge Orders Prosecution to Turn Over Possible DNA Evidence
By Cleveland Law Library
For better or worse, Ohio law currently only requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense in a criminal case. Although there are strenuous opponents, the law does not require prosecutors to turn over all police reports, witness statements and evidence. However, in a case that begs the question of what is exculpatory and/or should be disclosed, local Common Pleas Judge Eileen Gallagher has ordered the prosecution in the Holliman case (Case No. CR-07-503030-C on the Cuyahoga County CP docket) to turn over clothing and a bloody plastic bat allegedly used in the murder of a 15-year old girl and the stabbing of a boy who tried to help her. In a case of he said/she said, the prosecution is claiming that there was nothing to turn over because they had the defendants 'dead to rights' and thus did not need to order DNA testing, while the defense is presumably arguing that the items contained DNA that could or should have been tested to absolve them of criminal liability. Cases that discuss prosecutorial duties in reviewing and disclosing exculpatory evidence include State v. Lawson, 64 Ohio St.3d 336 (1992) and Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). For a discussion of privileged, confidential, law enforcement, investigatory records under Ohio's public records laws, see the 2008 Ohio Sunshine Laws Book from the Ohio Attorney General.
Full post as published by Cleveland Law Library Weblog on June 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
"Exculpatory or Not, Judge Orders Prosecution to Turn Over Possible DNA Evidence"
From the blog: “For better or worse, Ohio law currently only requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence to the...
Enron prosecution
Did it withhold exculpatory evidence from the defense?...
Federal Judge Orders IRS to Turn Over Data to TRAC
Update: Here is a copy of the court order in Long v. United States, No. 2:74-cv-00724 (W.D. WA 6/13/08). From today's Seattle Times: Judge Orders IRS to Turn Over Data; A Federal Judge Has Found the IRS in Defiance of...
It Might Just Work
While I was contemplating the six-thousand-year-old theropod and sauropod tracks on Mr. McFall’s farm over the weekend, Dallas D.A. Craig Watkins came out in favor of summarily executing prosecutors who concealed exculpatory evidence ...
JUDGE GRANTS DEFENDANT NEW TRIAL WHEN PROSECUTION VIOLATES DEFENDANTS RIGHT BY FAILING TO TURN OVER DISCOVERY
When you are accused of a crime the prosecution must turn over discovery to your lawyer so that he can assist you to prepare your defense. In a recent federal criminal prosecution the defendants conviction was reversed when a federal judge found that the prosecution had ?persistently and recklessly violated its constitutional responsibilities to discovery and disclose crucial information? to the defense...
Defendants Have Right to Exculpatory Evidence
Prosecution must make favorable material evidence available to defendants. California court affirms defendants constitutional right to exculpatory evidence. In the case People v. Ubire, the prosecution failed to give the defense a video taken during the only physical medical examination of the alleged victim...
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Greka Oll and Gas
EPA Orders Clean-up of Toxic PCBs
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.
Technician Whistleblower
Jury orders DuPont Chambers Works to pay $1.224 million settlement to employee.
Correctional Managers
Jury orders Marion County to pay $1 million racial discrimination settlement to two former employees.









