Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Federal Civil Practice Bulletin
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Federal Civil Practice BulletinN.D.N.Y. Uphold Punitive Damages Award with 3-to-1 Ratio in Police Abuse Case
A trial was held on February 25, 26, 27, 28, and March 6, 2008. The jury rendered a verdict on behalf of plaintiff, Phillip Lewis (?Lewis? or ?plaintiff?), and against defendant William Bonanni (?Bonanni?) finding that he used excessive physical force in arresting plaintiff on November 23, 2002, thus violating his constitutional rights. . . . The jury found that the violations of plaintiff's constitutional rights was a proximate cause of compensatory or actual damages to him, and awarded him the amount of $65,000. Further, the jury found that Lewis was entitled to an award of punitive damages against Bonanni. Upon reconvening on March 6, 2008, after hearing closing arguments of counsel for Lewis and Bonanni, the jury returned a verdict awarding plaintiff punitive damages in the amount of $200,000.
. . .
Bonanni . . . argues that the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages-because there was a substantial award of compensatory damages the punitive award should be no more than an equal amount. Because Bonanni's use of excessive force against Lewis was racially motivated and occurred while plaintiff was handcuffed, it is particularly reprehensible. Further, the punitive damages award is three times the amount of compensatory damages, an acceptable ratio. See Patterson, 440 F.3d at 121 (noting that a punitive damages award of ? ?more than 4 times the amount of compensatory damages' ? has been upheld by the United States Supreme Court (quoting Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 23-24, 111 S.Ct. 1032, 1046, 113 L.Ed.2d 1 (1991))). Finally, a comparison of the difference between this award and those from comparable cases leads to the conclusion that this jury's $200,000 award of punitive damages is not so grossly excessive as to shock the judicial conscience. See, e.g., Ismail v. Cohen, 899 F.2d 183, (2d Cir.1990) (upholding $150,000 punitive damage award [$242,952.95 adjusted for inflation] ); O'Neill v. Krzeminski, 839 F.2d 9, 13-14 (2d Cir.1988) (finding, in an excessive force case where handcuffed suspect was repeatedly struck on the head by law enforcement officers, punitive damage award totaling $185,000 [$331,049.92 adjusted for inflation] against the two defendants not excessive).
Full post as published by Federal Civil Practice Bulletin on July 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Financial Elder Abuse - Financial Exploitation, Elder Abuse Lawyers
Financial Elder Abuse alleging seniors are taken advantage of for their finances.
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
Teacher Student Abuse
Beaufort County agrees to pay $300,000 settlement to abuse victim.
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations

On our way to a 1:1 ratio with punitive damages
Oregon Supreme Court Sets 4 to1 Ratio on Punitive Damages in Economic Injury Cases
Punitive Damage Award Limited to 1:1 Ratio
United States Supreme Court cuts Exxon Valdez punitive damage award
"Punitive Damages, Retribution, and Due Process"
Court reopens punitive damages case









