ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Michigan Blogs -> Michigan DUI Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Michigan

: Michigan DUI Law

Court Denies DUI Defendant?s Request to Withdraw Guilty Plea to Operating While Intoxicated

By admin

ADVERTISEMENTS

On October 30, 2007, the Michigan Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion in the case People v. Bach, affirmed the trial court’s decision to deny the DUI defendant’s request to withdraw her guilty plea to a third offense of operating while intoxicated (OWI) with a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher under M.C.L. 257.625(1). The DUI defendant was sentenced to 23 to 60 months imprisonment.

The DUI defendant’s primary argument on appeal was that her first OWI conviction was obtained in violation of her right to counsel and, therefore, that first operating while intoxicated conviction could not be used to support her OWI third offense conviction. Specifically, the DUI defendant claimed that she was denied her request for a court appointed lawyer and her first OWI conviction eventually led to five days in prison. Consequently, she argued on appeal that the trial court erred for denying her request to withdraw her guilty plea.

The Michigan Court of Appeals disagreed. “‘A collateral attack on a prior conviction underlying a present charge may not be made after a defendant?s plea of guilty to the present charge is accepted.’” Citing the Michigan Supreme Court case People v. Roseberry, the court of appeals noted that, “To be timely, such a motion must be made before a defendant?s plea of guilty or nolo contendere is accepted.”

Based on this rule, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court. “In the case at bar, once the Lenawee transcript was filed in the circuit court, the trial court accepted defendant?s guilty plea without any further discussion between the court and the parties. Therefore, even if we were to assume that defendant?s first OWI conviction was obtained in violation of her right to counsel, because defendant?s plea was accepted without defendant moving to set aside the prior conviction, defendant could no longer make a collateral attack regarding her prior underlying OWI conviction.”

The DUI defendant also raised on appeal an ineffective assistance of counsel argument, which the Michigan Court of Appeals rejected.

Click here to read the entire opinion.


The GL Law Group, PLC provides free information on Michigan DUI law and guide to choosing a good Michigan DUI attorney. If you have recently been arrested for a DUI, it?s important to contact a good DUI lawyer soon. A guilty DUI conviction can ruin your life. Contact us to set up a free DUI case review.

Add to any service

Full post as published by Michigan DUI Law on November 02, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0026 secs (from cache 10/31/26 03:53:51)