Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation Support
: Ride the Lightning: Electronic EvidenceVOTING MACHINES: IT?S NOT A BUG ? IT?S A FEATURE
With the election so close, it was timely to read recently about the faux pas committed by voting machines. For years, I?ve been preaching that these machines are NOT reliable ? and Lord knows, the students at Princeton have busy proving it. Check out this link: http://citp.princeton.edu/
So . . . from West Virginia . . . a cautionary tale about a crucial piece of electronic evidence. In Jackson County, a very Republican County, three early voters had a really hard time voting for their preferred candidates. According to Virginia Matheney, "When I touched the screen for Barack Obama, the check mark moved from his box to the box indicating a vote for John McCain." When she reported the problem, she said, the poll worker in charge "responded that everything was all right. It was just that the screen was sensitive and I was touching the screen too hard. She instructed me to use only my fingernail." So she dutifully used her fingernail. Same problem.
Calvin Thomas, 81, also experienced difficulty. "When I pushed Obama, it jumped to McCain. When I hollered about that, the girl who worked there said, 'Push it again.' I pushed Obama again and it stayed there. Then, the machine did the same thing for other candidates.? Thomas insightfully wondered how many other people, especially older folks, might not notice that something was amiss. So what did the authorities have to say? Well, sometimes machines can become miscalibrated when they are moved from storage facilities to early voting areas. Yeah, ok, so how come you don?t test them when you make the move? Even Homer Simpson might scornfully say ?D?oh.?
Jackson County Clerk Jeff Waybright?s response to the issue? ?After we got a call from the Secretary of State's Office, we recalibrated the machine. We had already voted over 400 people with no problems." Voting problems occur when voters touch the screen, Waybright said, but do not put their fingers inside boxes for their candidates. Waybright blamed the problem on voters. Well now, that?s mighty convenient. Clearly, in the case of the individuals cited above, the problem wasn?t user error.
I was delighted to hear that my current and former paralegals are helping to monitor polling places for this election. I?m glad to see so many law students and lawyers are working on election day, ?keeping them honest.? It doesn?t matter which way you vote, but let?s all be comfortable that votes are being recorded faithfully. At least with paper our biggest worry was chads.
E-mail: snelson@senseient.com Phone: 703-359-0700
Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on October 27, 2008 (boomark / email).
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
Feature Film Piracy
Chinese company settles piracy suit with Hollywood studios.
Hewlett Packard
Fax Machines Recalled
Frigidaire
Recalls Washing Machines
Elliptical Machines
Recalled by Stamina Products

Which Are More Important: Breathalyzers or Slot Machines
Gambling machines more regulated than voting machines
Unattended Voting Machines, As Usual
New Jersey: independent reivew of e-voting machines approved
"New York Closer to Better Voting Machines"
More info on Hugo Chavez connection to US voting machines
Forecast for November: flawed machines will probably count your votes
NJ Election Discrepancies Worse Than Previously Thought, Contradict Sequoias Explanation








