Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation Support
: Ride the Lightning: Electronic EvidenceTOSSING PRIVILEGE OVERBOARD: VICTOR STANLEY V. CREATIVE PIPE
It?s the case everyone is talking about. Defendants inadvertently produced 165 documents which they claimed were privileged. The formidable Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm has written a thoughtful opinion which truly bears careful study.
In the end, sloppy electronic discovery practices resulted in tossing privilege overboard. Presuming that all the documents were indeed privileged, Judge Grimm examined, in particular:
1) the reasonableness of the precautions taken to prevent inadvertent disclosure;
2) the number of inadvertent disclosures
3) the extent of the disclosures;
4) any delay in measures taken to rectify the disclosure; and
5) overriding interests in justice
Defendants did a lot of bleating to the court about how lengthy the review process was, the volume of data yada, yada. The usual refrain. But here were some of the points the court obviously found persuasive:
1) Defendants had originally asked for a clawback agreement and then dropped the request, saying that they would be able to do a document by document review.
2) Defendants failed to provide the court with information regarding the keywords used, the rationale for their selection, the qualifications of those who devised the keywords, the methodology of the searching, or whether the results were assessed for reliability and quality.
3) Plaintiffs actually discovered the documents and immediately segregated them and notified the Plaintiffs. Plaintiff said that they documents were easily identified by using a readily available desktop search tool in about an hour.
4) Quite a number of privileged documents were produced ? this was not a instance of a single document which fell through the cracks.
5) Those produced should have been easy to find as many were substantive and comprised of communications between Defendants and their counsel.
The opinion really contains a fairly complete "best practices" protocol for protecting privilege. And a splendid illustration of how to lose it!
The opinion in the case may be found at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Opinions/VictorStanley052908.pdf
E-mail: snelson@senseient.com Phone: 703-359-0700
Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on June 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Morgan Stanley Capital
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
International Creative Management, Inc
TV Writers Settle First of 23 Class Actions for $4.5 Million
New York City
Seniors' Centers Found to Have Exposed Asbestos-Pipe Insulation
Burst Drain Pipe
Town of Smithtown agrees to pay homeowners $260,000 property damage settlement.

Discovery of electronically stored information (ESI)
Grimm's Guide to Asserting Attorney-Client Privilege
Victor Cha: Sports and International Politics
"Decisions Up Stakes for Managing EDD"
Victor Cha on the Olympics and Political Change in China








