Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation Support
: Ride the Lightning: Electronic EvidenceINACCESSIBLE ESI: WHAT ARE THE COURTS SAYING?
My friend and colleague David Isom writes terrific poetry. So I have to say that reading his recent article in the Federal Courts Law Review was not nearly as much fun as reading his poetry!
That aside, it was very informative reading and well writen, if not poetic. The article is entitled "The Burden of Discoverying Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information: Rules 26(b)(2)(B) and 45(d)(1)(D)." It was one thing to have those two rules, but quite another to see how the courts would interpret them in practice. All the time, we hear in court "The evidence is critical" v. "the burden is too great" argument, so it is very useful to have the court cases rounded up in a neat package, with some thoughtful commentary along the way.
Good job David, but give me poetry next time!
E-mail: snelson@senseient.com Phone: 703-359-0700
Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on February 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected

Underfunded and understaffed - what the Lord Chief Justice thinks of his department
In blog-related and non-blog-related updates









