ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> The Trial Technologist's View

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation Support

: The Trial Technologist's View

Combating Biased Evidence / Images

By Blake Boyd

ADVERTISEMENTS

The use of photographic evidence is always the best way to prove your point, if you have the correct photo. Experienced photographers use different angles to make subject’s sizes, proportions and distances look different then they really are.

This photograph was produced by opposing counsel. The question in this lawsuit was: If the machine was using the full shoulder, would it have prevented a head on collision by a passing car and incoming truck? This photograph was taken by the opposing expert, and we knew they would rely on this picture to show that it would have never made a difference.

cat8.jpg
What do you think? How much space is available? A foot left on the shoulder? Three feet to the middle line?

You might be surprised… It took 4 of us studying the CAD drawing that was produced (so complicated a average juror would not be able to discern), to realize that there is much more space than the picture depicts.

divider.jpg
We explained the distances in a 3 step process. First showing all 3 distances (shoulder, to middle, point of impact) then using a easel and pad to hand write the distances if the machine had traveled on the shoulder.
cat8-1.jpgcat8-2.jpgcat8-3.jpg
I think it even surprised opposing counsel, and I know for sure it was eye opening to the jury. The photos had been shown over and over before actually showing the pictures with a graphic overlay. We had talked about the numbers, looked at the numbers, even created a drawing with the numbers, but nothing compares to actually seeing them in a reconstruction photograph.
divider.jpg

Always be sure to study your main photographic evidence. In situations such as this, a photograph could be used against you unjustly. If the pictures would have never been showed with numbers overlayed, the jury might have never been able to comprehend the point. And the point is: If the machine would have used the entire shoulder there would have been almost 9′ for the person to pass (without having to travel into the oncoming traffics lane).

A couple more photographs we added overlays to:
cat7-1.jpgcat9-1.jpg
cat9-2.jpgcat9-3.jpg

Full post as published by The Trial Technologist's View on August 25, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0031 secs (from cache 10/31/26 07:53:58)