Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingNow that's an expensive postage stamp!
Thereafter, the sculptor of those soldiers brought suit against the USPS, asserting that he owned the copyright in the sculptures and that the postage stamp did not constitute a "fair use" of his sculptures. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims rejected the copyright infringement claim in a ruling from December 2008 that you can access here. The trial court ruled that the sculptor owned the copyright but that the postage stamp's use of the images constituted fair use.
Today, however, the majority on a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has reversed that ruling, holding that the postage stamp's use of those images did not constitute fair use. You can access today's ruling at this link. As a result, the Federal Circuit's decision holds that the USPS is liable to the sculptor and remands the case back to the trial court so that damages may be determined.
Earlier coverage of the case can be accessed here, here, and here.
Full post as published by How Appealing on February 25, 2010 (boomark / email).
Network Solutions and ICANN
allegedly registers searched domain names to prevent others from selling and forces customers to pay expensive fees.
Food Stamp Fraud
Woman to pay $48,530 settlement in TennCare lawsuit.

Mailed Oregon Election Ballots Require 59 Cents Postage!
FFRF Objects To Planned Mother Teresa Postage Stamp
First Class Stamp Increasing to 42 Cents
"Is postage stamp a bribe Parties trade accusations"
First Class Stamp Now 42 Cents
Freedom from Religion Foundation: Action Alert: Protest Mother Teresa Stamp







