ADVERTISEMENT

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Litigation

: How Appealing

"These facts present a novel question of law: when an owner of a computer consents to its seizure, does that consent include the computer's hard drive even when it was installed by another who claims ownership of it and objects to its seizure?"

ADVERTISEMENTS

"These facts present a novel question of law: when an owner of a computer consents to its seizure, does that consent include the computer's hard drive even when it was installed by another who claims ownership of it and objects to its seizure?" A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued this ruling today.

Full post as published by How Appealing on May 01, 2010 (boomark / email).

Related Law Articles

Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles

Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries

Lawsuits and Settlements

Satyam Computer Services Ltd.
SAY

Satyam Computer Services Ltd.
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

Nvidia and AMD
charged with price-fixing computer GPU (graphics processing units) chips

Computer Spyware Act
Spammer to pay $100,000 settlement in email fraud lawsuit.

Patni Computer Systems Ltd.
H-1B visa holders to get $2.4 million settlement from federal wage rate violation suit.

Consumer Funding
BlueHippo Funding agrees to set up $5 million restitution fund after modifying its computer sales program.

Related Searches

US Law

#1 Online Legal Resource

Ask Legal Questions

US Law Directory

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CA11: 21 day delay in getting SW for computer search was unreasonable; a seizure lawful at its inception can become unreasonable

Defendant revoked consent to computer search, but by then the officers had seen enough to get a search warrant, so inevitable discovery supported admission of the evidence

E.D.Tenn.: Palin e-mail hacking case: Hard drive could be seized and searched offsite, and all files could be search

CA7: Defense counsel not filing a more elaborate motion to suppress hardly IAC where defendant could not win

United States v. Megahed and Withdrawn Consent to Search a Computer Image:

CA8 en banc avoids applying Randolph to computer search where defendant refused consent before his wife was asked because he was not present and objecting

0.002 secs (from cache 11/06/26 16:49:31)