ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Illinois Trial Practice Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Illinois Trial Practice Blog

Videotaping Your Opponent's Deposition

By Evan Schaeffer

ADVERTISEMENTS

Situation: Your opponent notices a deposition. For one reason or another, you want to videotape it. Do you need your opponent's consent?

Obviously, the answer depends on the jurisdiction. The issue recently led to a dispute in New Jersey, as recounted here at Law.com. In short, the defense lawyer noticed the plaintiff's deposition and the plaintiff's lawyer wanted to videotape it. Since the plaintiff had suffered a brain injury, the plaintiff's lawyer wanted a record of the plaintiff's difficulty in answering questions. This difficulty might not be evident from the dry printed transcript, which wouldn't record pauses and the like.

As the rules in New Jersey didn't expressly provide for one party to videotape another party's deposition, the dispute had to be resolved by the court, which allowed the videotape. The decision is posted here (pdf).

What's the rule in Illinois? The situation is easier, as the rules expressly provide for videotaping another party's deposition. According to Rule 206(a)(2)--

(2) Audio-Visual Recording to be Used. If a party serving notice of deposition intends to record the deponent's testimony by use of an audio-visual recording device, the notice of deposition must so advise all parties to the deposition. If any other party intends to record the testimony of the witness by use of an audio-visual recording device, notice of that intent must likewise be served upon all other parties a reasonable time in advance. Such notices shall contain the name of the recording-device operator. After notice is given that a deposition will be recorded by an audio-visual recording device, any party may make a motion for relief in the form of a protective order under Rule 201. If a hearing is not held prior to the taking of the deposition, the recording shall be made subject to the court's ruling at a later time.

Illinois Supreme Court Rule 206(a)(2) (emphasis added). Though the rule allows videotaping without the need for consent, it also provides any party with the right to challenge the videotaping by way of a motion for protective order prior to the deposition.

Related posts:

1. "Controlling Abusive Counsel with Video Depositions."

2. "Videotaping the Deposition of Your Opposing Expert."

Full post as published by The Illinois Trial Practice Blog on August 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.785 secs (new cache)