Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Illinois Trial Practice Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: The Illinois Trial Practice BlogVideotaping Your Opponent's Deposition
By Evan Schaeffer
Situation: Your opponent notices a deposition. For one reason or another, you want to videotape it. Do you need your opponent's consent?
Obviously, the answer depends on the jurisdiction. The issue recently led to a dispute in New Jersey, as recounted here at Law.com. In short, the defense lawyer noticed the plaintiff's deposition and the plaintiff's lawyer wanted to videotape it. Since the plaintiff had suffered a brain injury, the plaintiff's lawyer wanted a record of the plaintiff's difficulty in answering questions. This difficulty might not be evident from the dry printed transcript, which wouldn't record pauses and the like.
As the rules in New Jersey didn't expressly provide for one party to videotape another party's deposition, the dispute had to be resolved by the court, which allowed the videotape. The decision is posted here (pdf).
What's the rule in Illinois? The situation is easier, as the rules expressly provide for videotaping another party's deposition. According to Rule 206(a)(2)--
(2) Audio-Visual Recording to be Used. If a party serving notice of deposition intends to record the deponent's testimony by use of an audio-visual recording device, the notice of deposition must so advise all parties to the deposition. If any other party intends to record the testimony of the witness by use of an audio-visual recording device, notice of that intent must likewise be served upon all other parties a reasonable time in advance. Such notices shall contain the name of the recording-device operator. After notice is given that a deposition will be recorded by an audio-visual recording device, any party may make a motion for relief in the form of a protective order under Rule 201. If a hearing is not held prior to the taking of the deposition, the recording shall be made subject to the court's ruling at a later time.
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 206(a)(2) (emphasis added). Though the rule allows videotaping without the need for consent, it also provides any party with the right to challenge the videotaping by way of a motion for protective order prior to the deposition.
Related posts:
Full post as published by The Illinois Trial Practice Blog on August 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Is videotaping interrogations a better solution
In my post discussing the demise of Miranda, I approvingly quoted the author’s mention of videotaping confessions as a possible solution. Scott writes today and warns us not to get too invested in videotaped confessions and why they may not be the answer...
Deposition Podcasts: Advanced Techniques
For free deposition advice, why not try my three podcasts on advanced deposition techniques? Originally posted Legal Underground, I'm reprising them here. Just follow the links-- Advanced Deposition Techniques #1: Five Tips for Asserting Control at Depositions Advanced Deposition Techniques...
What is a Deposition
I have spent the day preparing for depositions and I thought it might be a good topic to discuss.Once your lawsuit is filed , you will probably be required to give your deposition ...
Deposition Tip: Visit the Scene
When a deposition involves an event that occurred at a specific scene, try to visit the scene as part of the your deposition preparation. Examples: the intersection where a car accident occurred; the parking lot where a plaintiff slipped on...
Swear Once and Only Once So Help You God: New Yorker Fined for Swearing in Deposition
You are only allowed to swear once in deposition — at the start and to God. This is a lesson being taught to New York mortgage company owner, Aaron Wider. Federal Trial Judge Eduardo Robreno hit Wider with a $29,323 fine for swearing 73 times in the deposition, shown in an excerpted video [...
Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against New England Patriots for Videotaping
Today a former St. Louis Rams player and three fans filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of themelves and those similarly situated against the New England Patriots for damages resulting from the alleged videotaping of the St...










