Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Northwest Business Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Northwest Business Litigation BlogI Tube, You Tube, We All Tube: Avoiding liability for user-generated content
By Matt Hedberg
Thanks to the rapid growth in the public's desire and ability to communicate through the internet, publication of User Generated Content ("UGC") has exploded. Companies such as YouTube and MySpace are among the businesses that have capitalized on the distribution of online content by the internet audience. But the use of UGC by companies doing business online can raise difficult legal issues. Three such issues are copyright infringement, defamation, and violation of privacy rights.
Copyright infringement includes direct infringement, contributory infringement, and vicarious infringement. Key elements of liability include knowledge of the infringing activity, inducement or contribution to the infringing conduct, and attaining a direct financial interest in the infringing activity when there is an ability to supervise the direct infringer. Two significant cases alleging copyright infringement as a result of UGC are pending against YouTube (Viacom Intl., Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.) and MySpace (UMG Recordings Inc. v. MySpace Inc.). These cases may provide an opportunity for the courts to analyze the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA),17 U.S.C. sec. 512, specifically section 512(c), which applies to user-directed storage of material on a system.
Defamation is a potential consequence of allowing UGC to be posted on a company's website. The Communications Decency Act ("CDA") provides tort immunity to internet service providers in certain situations. While this immunity provision is broad, it has its limits. To read our earlier coverage of a recent CDA case in which the Ninth Circuit did not shield an on-line service as a result of UGC, click here.
Publication of UGC content can also implicate privacy and publicity rights as a result of the unauthorized use of photos and other media protected by privacy laws. Common claims for damages include causing embarrassment and damage to reputation.
To minimize liability for the use of UGC, companies should be vigilant about complying with the requirements of the DMCA Section 512(c) safe harbor provision. Companies utilizing UGC should also seek out licenses from content owners and use comprehensive click-wrap agreements to which submitting users must agree. Examples of such agreements can be found on YouTube and MySpace. Finally, companies choosing to use UGC on their websites should conduct routine scrutiny of the UGC content to ensure liability exposure is minimized.
Full post as published by Northwest Business Litigation Blog on April 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Probation User Fees
Clark County Council pays $1.1 million settlement after misappropriating funds.
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Settlement
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Class Action Settlement
Lip Gloss Keychains
for Lead Content
Mobile Content Class Action Settlement Announced
Mobile Content Class Action Settlement Announced
Google
alleging that companies who used internet advertising to sell mobile content have overpaid for keywords.
Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile, Verizon and Alltel
allegedly charging customers for unauthorized mobile content

Naomi Cahn on "Test Tube Families"
Born Alive Abortion Survivor targets Obama on Hannity & Colmes
Inner-Tube Bandit might be a criminal genius
Jean Charles de Menezes inquest jurors visit Stockwell tube station
Law Firm Launches You Tube Video
ADF: Florida man fails to have wifes feeding tube removed









