ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: How Appealing

Three-judge Sixth Circuit panel grapples over whether it's a federal crime to commit murder in a national forest

ADVERTISEMENTS
Three-judge Sixth Circuit panel grapples over whether it's a federal crime to commit murder in a national forest: For the second time in 20 days, a federal appellate court has issued a ruling addressing whether the federal courts have jurisdiction over murders committed in a national forest.

Late last month, a three-judge Tenth Circuit panel issued a lengthy ruling addressing and rejecting a federal death row inmate's challenge to the exercise of federal jurisdiction over a double-murder committed at the Ouachita National Forest in Oklahoma. My earlier coverage of that ruling appears here.

Today, a three-judge Sixth Circuit panel splits 2-1 -- with each judge on the panel writing separately -- over whether a murder committed in the Manistee National Forest in Michigan can be prosecuted as a federal offense. The majority answers "yes" in a decision that you can access here. Senior Circuit Judge Gilbert S. Merritt's dissenting opinion begins:

Although it may seem at first glance somewhat counterintuitive to say that the federal courts do not have general or plenary subject matter jurisdiction over murder and other crimes in the national forests, that is, in fact, the situation. That is the situation because our system of federalism requires that Congress act by clear positive legislation to create such criminal jurisdiction, and Congress has not done so. There is no common-law, federal criminal, subject-matter jurisdiction in national forests or elsewhere, and this concept has been a part of our system of checks and balances limiting the power of the federal government from the beginning.
I'll leave it up to others to speculate over whether the recent issuance of these two appellate court rulings indicate that national forests are especially dangerous places to visit.

Full post as published by How Appealing on March 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0026 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:29:23)