Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingThird Circuit affirms federal district court decision finding that the Child Online Protection Act facially violates the First and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution and permanently enjoining the Attorney General from enforcing that act
Update: You can now access the opinion via the Third Circuit's web site at this link.
And The Associated Press reports that "Court affirms online content law unconstitutional."
Full post as published by How Appealing on July 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Child Support
Finding the Noncustodial Parent ( Deadbeat Dads )
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Whole Foods
And Other Firms Sued by California Attorney General,
State Farm
Settles with Mississippi Attorney General
Ticketmaster Entertainment
Settles with New Jersey Attorney General

3rd. Circuit affirms Child Online Protection Act unconstitutional
Third Circuit finds Child Online Protection Act facially unconstitutional
3rd Circuit Strikes Down COPA Again
3rd Circuit: Child Online Protection Act facially violates First and Fifth Amendments
USPTO to Appeal Tafas/GSK v. Dudas
Intrinsic evidence supported pre-Phillips claim construction; finding of noninfringement affirmed








