ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> California Civil Litigation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: California Civil Litigation

Review Roundup I

ADVERTISEMENTS
Hughes v. Pair (S157197)

The Supreme Court has granted review in three of the cases that I have written about on this blawg. Its acceptance of Hughes v. Pair on November 28th is the one that I find satisfying.

In a previous post I promised to explain why FEHA and Title VII case law should not be used to make decisions under Civil Code section 51.9. It turns out that a vastly more qualified authority will address the question of whether FEHA's standards and definitions should be used to evaluate a claim for sexual harassment under Civil Code section 51.9. Obviously, I have already picked a side in this one.

Full post as published by California Civil Litigation on December 07, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0019 secs (from cache 10/31/26 09:20:27)