Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> eDiscovery Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: eDiscovery LawOhio Supreme Court Seeking Public Comment on Proposed E-Discovery Amendments
By reston, Gates and Ellis
The Supreme Court of Ohio is now accepting public comments on proposed amendments to the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure addressing electronic discovery. The amendments to Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 36, 37, and 45 are based on the December 2006 amendments made to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Click to view the proposed amendments as published for public comment.
Comments on the proposed amendments must be submitted in writing to: Jo Ellen Cline, Legislative Counsel, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, 7th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3431 or ClineJ@sconet.state.oh.us and received no later than March 4, 2008.
The proposed amendments were recommended to the Supreme Court by the Supreme Court Commission on the Rules of Practice and Procedure and initially were initially published for comment on October 15, 2007. After reviewing the comments received, the Commission recommended further revisions to the previously published amendments. After considering the written comments and the recommendations of the Commission, the Supreme Court adopted the proposed amendments and directed that the amendments be filed with the General Assembly and republished for public comment.
Accordingly, the revised proposed amendments were filed with the General Assembly on January 14, 2008. The Commission on the Rules of Practice and Procedure and the Supreme Court will consider all comments received during this second comment period, and the Court may modify or withdraw proposed amendments prior to May 1, 2008. The amendments filed with the General Assembly and not withdrawn prior to May 1, 2008 will take effect on July 1, 2008, unless prior to that date the General Assembly adopts a concurrent resolution of disapproval.
Full post as published by eDiscovery Law on January 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ohio Health Centers
Ohio Health Centers Sued for Improper Billing
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Ohio Drinking Water
Contaminated with Acid
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Ohio Supreme Court Prepares to Adopt Electronic Discovery Rules
Ohio Supreme Court rule amendments
Round 2 Opens for Comments on Access to Ohio Court Records
Ind. Courts - Proposed amendments to Court rules
"Ohio Supreme Court Rule Amendments"
Ohio "commercial docket" Rules of Superintendence/ Criminal & Civil Procedure, including EDD








