Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"In a Mentor, Kagan's Critics See Liberal Agenda"

"In a Mentor, Kagan's Critics See Liberal Agenda": John Schwartz has this article today in The New York Times.

Today in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that "Kagan Hearings Promise Political Theater."

Michael Doyle and David Lightman of McClatchy Newspapers report that "Kagan treads carefully ahead of her turn in Senate spotlight."

The Harvard Crimson reports that "Kagan's Stance on Military Recruiting Under Scrutiny."

At Politico.com, Josh Gerstein has an article headlined "Elena Kagan and the porn wars."

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined "How Elena Kagan worked to limit military recruiting at Harvard." And Mike Sacks of the blog "First One @ One First" has a lengthy article headlined "Elena Kagan: Would she turn Supreme Court into We the People?"

Bloomberg News has articles headlined "Kagan Will Prove `Supremely Qualified,' Official Says"; "Kagan's Diverse, 'Decrepit' Manhattan Helped Shape Her Outlook"; and "Kagan Court Nomination Helps Interest Groups Raise Money, Rally Support."

Reuters has reports headlined "Senate set to begin Kagan court confirmation hearing" and "Kagan bucks 40-year trend as US court pick; Would be high court's fourth woman justice."

And on yesterday evening's broadcast of NPR's "All Things Considered," Nina Totenberg had an audio segment entitled "How Women Changed The High Court ... And Didn't."

Full post as published by How Appealing on June 26, 2010 (boomark / email).