Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Before Justices, First Amendment and Aid to Terrorists"

"Before Justices, First Amendment and Aid to Terrorists": Adam Liptak has this article today in The New York Times.

Today in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "Supreme Court weighs free speech against aid to terrorists."

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that "Supreme Court weighs anti-terrorism law, free-speech rights; The justices sound closely split over whether a USC professor illegally advised the Kurdistan Workers Party, listed as a foreign terrorist group."

In USA Today, Joan Biskupic reports that "Supreme Court seems split on dispute testing terror law."

In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that "Justices Wrestle With Terror Law."

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined "Supreme Court: Peace activists challenge US antiterror law; The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether an antiterror law violates the Constitution; The US solicitor general calls it 'a vital weapon'; A lawyer for international peace activists argues it will send his clients to prison."

And law.com's Tony Mauro reports that "Justices Seem Receptive to First Amendment Challenge to Anti-Terror Law; Apart from Scalia, support for the government's position seemed weak."

Full post as published by How Appealing on February 25, 2010 (boomark / email).