ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Bookmark Follow Me Email to a friend

Litigation

: Arkansas Business Litigation Blog

Jury Will Determine if Trademark License Creates Franchise Under Arkansas Franchise Practices Act

By H. William Allen et al. (all)

The Eastern District of Arkansas denied cross motions for summary judgment in Otto Dental Supply, Inc. v. Kerr Corp., 2008 WL 410630 (E.D. Ark. 2/13/08).

 

For 25 years, Otto Dental was an authorized dealer of Kerr, using Kerr's trademarks to market and sell its goods. In 2004, Kerr imposed a purchasing requirement on its dealers. When Otto could not meet the requirement, Kerr terminated the relationship. Otto argues the parties formed a franchise under the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act, and Kerr violated the act. See A.C.A. § 4-72-201, et seq. Kerr argues the parties did not create a franchise.

 

Both parties moved for summary judgment, but the court determined that the jury must decide whether the parties created a franchise.

Full post as published by Arkansas Business Litigation Blog on February 20, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Related Law Questions
Lawsuits and Settlements


















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource









Click here






Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











Click here
0.2356 secs