ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Structured Settlements 4Real

Ferris Lebous(ler) Gives "Day Off" To Factoring Company

By John Darer

ADVERTISEMENTS

A Broome County New York Supreme Court judge, Ferris D. Lebous recently ruled against a proposed structured settlement transfer involving a 27 year old structured settlement annuitant Eric R. Lindsey. Lindsey hoped to transfer a $20,000 lump sum annuity payment scheduled for November 2010 to buy a motor vehicle.

The factoring company in question, Settlement Funding of New York LLC (believed to be the New York front for a large national factoring company-TBA), offered Lindsey $9,517.07 for his rights to the $20,000 structured settlement payment, which represented only a portion of the overall structured settlement created when he was a child. The figure included the gross advance amount of $11,717.07, legal fees of $2,000, and a $200 assessment for costs and disbursements.

In his ruling that the factoring transaction was not in Lindsey's best interest, Judge Lebous cited the discount rate applied to the transaction of 19.9%, the fees and expenses used to determine the net amount, and the fact that the transfer amount wound up being less than 47% of the amount that Ferris would get if he waited for the disbursement. Apparently another mitigating factor was that Lindsey had nothing to show for the $55,000 he had already received.   

Comments

  1. 19.9% is a pathetic discount rate which simply demonstrates that the seller didn't shop and the blatant opportunism of the buyer. 19.9% is NOT EVEN CLOSE to the reality of the market place. The buyer simply wasted Lindsey's and the Court's time.
  2. While a motor vehicle seems like a reasonable expense to Eric R. Lindsey get to and from work, it's clear that annuitants must do more than just show up in Court. WHERE'S THE PLAN, MAN? Did Eric R. Lindsey contact an independent financial professional for advice or did he just call in from a hyponotic TV ad?
  3. In another example of editorial ineptitude, DealFlow Media's  April 2, 2008 coverage of this story inaccurately reports and thereby falsely implies that teh judge rejected the transfer amount because "it wound up being less than 47% of the amount that Ferris would get if HE waited for the disbursement".

Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on April 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0039 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:17:15)