ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

Brandenburg: Examine Judge?s Whole Record

By Peter Hardin

ADVERTISEMENTS

“When should a judge be thrown out of office?”

Bert Brandenburg, executive director of the Justice at Stake Campaign, offers a quick voter’s guide to answering that question in a guest commentary for the Denver Post. His advice can best be summed up by the column’s headline, Look at the “whole record of judges before voting.”

In Colorado, a group called Clear the Bench is pressing for ouster of three state Supreme Court justices in retention elections next week. Clear the Bench is angry about court rulings it says will raise taxes. The ouster drive in Colorado is one of several that have catapulted typically quiet retention elections into a national spotlight (see Gavel Grab) amid concern they might no longer escape high spending by special interest groups.

In broad terms, Brandenburg addresses what happens if voters remove justices over unpopular rulings:

“The greatest danger of ousting justices over a single issue is that it could force courts to ignore important constitutional rights in the face of fluctuating political pressures.”

In fact, retention elections are meant to be an option for voters to remove a judge “in the rare instance that he or she is unfit for office,” Brandenburg explains. These include instances when a judge has taken bribes or committed other serious crimes, shown general incompetence or failed to reach decisions on time.

Brandenburg lists tools that voters can use to learn more about a judge’s training, experience, and performance. He concludes:

“Considering a judge’s entire record, using multiple sources of information, is the best long-term insurance to protect any state’s system of justice. Beliefs and attitudes change with the decades, but the need for an impartial court system does not

“If we undermine our courts, through one-issue, litmus test voting, the rights that get disregarded may someday turn out to be our own.”

You can check out a Justice at Stake voter’s guide to retention elections by clicking here.

Full post as published by The Gavel on October 27, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/03/26 20:19:41)