Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Slaw.caX-Ray Vans Challenge Privacy
By Simon Fodden
Forbes published a story online yesterday about the use of “backscatter x-ray vision” in mobile vans. This scanning technology is the same as that employed at some airports, enabling authorities to see through clothing and luggage. The article features the product being advertized and sold by American Science and Engineering, which has sold more than 500 of the scanners. Their (in my view, creepy) promotional video is embedded below:
The backscatter technology and safety are discussed in the Wikipedia article on the subject.
The use of this technology creates obvious privacy problems, particularly when wielded by or on behalf of governments, as is likely to be the case most of the time. Canada’s Privacy Commissioner has addressed the use of “millimetre-wave full body scans” — a somewhat more powerful version of this technology — for airport searches:
In planning for the deployment of the first 44 of these scanners, the federal government pledged to implement the program in a way that respects people?s privacy and dignity.
Here?s what the government promised:
- Passengers selected for secondary screening, either at random or for cause, can choose to pass through the scanner or to undergo a physical search (see previous section.)
- No personal information, such as the passenger?s name, boarding pass number or passport information, is associated with the scanned image.
- The security officer with the passenger doesn?t see the scan, while the official viewing the scan cannot see the passenger.
- Images are examined for concealed threats and immediately deleted. They are not recorded or stored for future use.
So far as I know, she has not yet said anything about the mobile use of x-ray scanning.
Full post as published by Slaw.ca on August 25, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Privacy campaigner vows legal challenge to Street View
Illegal immigrants will be rounded-up by roaming prison vans
2007-2008 Sprinter passenger vans recalled because of failure to comply with safety standard
15-Passenger Van Accident Prevention Tips
How Ford Avoids the "Chicken Tax"








