Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Slaw.caTransboundary Waters Protection
By Simon Fodden
In the middle of May, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon introduced Bill C-26, the Transboundary Waters Protection Act, which has received 1st reading. According to the (as usual) excellent legislative summary from the Parliamentary Information and Research Service, the Bill has as its main features expansion of the waters affected by the existing prohibition on bulk water removals. Now waters that flow across the boundary between the U.S. and Canada are included, whereas before only waters that straddle the boundary were affected.
Prohibited “bulk removal” is defined as follows:
?bulk removal? means the removal of water from boundary or transboundary waters and the taking of that water, whether it has been treated or not, outside the Canadian portion of the water basin set out in Schedule 2 in which the waters are located (a) by any means of diversion, including by pipeline, canal, tunnel, aqueduct or channel; or (b) by any other means by which more than 50 000 L of water are taken outside the water basin per day. Bulk removal does not include the taking of a manufactured product that contains water, including water and other beverages in bottles or other containers, outside a water basin.
Critics point out that this does not prohibit the export of bottled water and that the 50,000 litre limit is not adequately restrictive. The Munk School of Global Affairs Program on Water Issues has written the Minister [PDF] to propose a number of “friendly” amendments. The letter points out what have to be two glaring — and therefore intended — omissions. 1. The likeliest means of exporting water from Canada would be to have water from basins that are neither transboundary or boundary basins pumped into a transboundary river, effectively exporting it as it flows out of the jurisdiction. 2. Though the Bill would prohibit the use of canals or pipelines, etc., in connection with boundary or transboundary wters, it says nothing about their use with respect to other water basins.
David Johansen, who prepared the legislative summary, has very recently updated his Background Paper on Bulk Water Removals: Canadian Legislation [PDF].
Full post as published by Slaw.ca on August 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Waters Corp
WAT
Waters Corp
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Hutchinson Oil
Over $75,000 settlement reached in consumer protection lawsuit.

Nollkaemper on Transboundary Environmental Cluster Litigation
World Water Week: Transboundary Waters and other flowing things
Congresswoman Waters urges Congress to take action to help struggling homeowners
Homeless man accused of brutal beating
AN ETHICS TRIAL FOR MAXINE WATERS A second House Democrat, Rep. Maxine Waters of California, coul









