Legal Research

There's a controversy, chronicled in the New York Times, over the posting, on Wikipedia, of the famous Rorschach ink blots, along with the most commonly given responses.  Opponents of the posting argue that this amounts to a virtual cheat sheet for those wishing to game the test.  Others say that following that logic would lead to the removal of other tests, like the Snellen eye chart, which, if memorized by the near-sighted, could enable them to obtain unrestricted drivers' licenses and create havoc on the highways.  It's an interesting issue, pitting those who believe that information wants to be free against those who fear that information in the wrong hands can be dangerous.  If you keep some information  secret, where do you draw the line?  Who decides?