ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Fastcase Legal News

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Fastcase Legal News

Second Amendment Redux: McDonald v. Chicago Roundup

ADVERTISEMENTS

Less than 48 hours after the Supreme Court granted certiorari in McDonald v. Chicago (08-1521), the blogosphere is already reverberating with reactions. The question presented in McDonald is ?Whether the Second Amendment is incorporated into the Due Process Clause or the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment so as to be applicable to the States, thereby invalidating ordinances prohibiting possession of handguns in the home.?

In other words, the Supreme Court will tackle the knotty question of whether to extend the landmark holding of District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008)--that the Second Amendment entitles citizens to keep hand-guns in their homes for self-protection--to trump state and municipal regulations. As it stands, the Second Amendment protections established in Heller explicitly apply only to federal regulations.

Justice Sotomayor may be the newest member of the Supreme Court, but McDonald will not be her first time at the Second Amendment rodeo. Before she was elevated to the Supreme Court, Judge Sotomayor, was on the Second Circuit panel that decided Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2009). Although the plaintiff?s weapon of choice in Maloney was a chuka stick rather than a handgun, the issue was essentially the same: whether the state?s ban on these weapons ran afoul of the Second Amendment?s grant of the right to bear and keep arms. The Second Circuit, like the Seventh Circuit in McDonald, declined to extend the Second Amendment?s protections to state regulations, leaving that task for the Supreme Court. See 554 F.3d at 59.

What will Justice Sotomayor do with the issue now that she (along with her Supreme Court colleagues) has the power to decide it? We will be watching.

For additional McDonald v. Chicago coverage, check out:

Full post as published by Fastcase Legal News on October 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/02/26 19:34:33)