Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: FindLaw's Common LawS.F. Passes SAR Ordinance Even as New Studies Question Risk
As previously discussed in a prior post on this blog, the City of San Francisco has been moving toward passage of an ordinance that would require retailers of cell phones to post the "specific absorption rate" or SAR of each cell phone for sale. The SAR is the amount of radiation absorbed by the body when the phone sends a signal to the network. The maximum SAR level set by the FCC is currently 1.6 watts per kilogram of body tissue.
According to the Los Angeles Times, on June 23, in a 9-1 vote, the S.F. Board of Supervisors passed the cell phone right-to-know ordinance. "Government agencies and scientific bodies in the European Union and Israel have recognized the potential harm of long-term exposure" to radiation from cellphones and have issued warnings about their use, especially by children," the ordinance states.
But do they? A study by the World Health Organization published just last month found that overall there was no increase in the risk for two types of brain tumors, glioma and mengioma with cell phone use. However, the Times reports the study also found that there were "suggestions of an increased risk of glioma at the highest exposure levels," but said a direct causal link had not been made. The study covered cell phone users in 13 countries. It did not include the United States.
An another cellphone related study by the British Medical Journal was announced this week. According to PBS, children whose mothers lived near cell phone towers while they were pregnant did not have an increased risk of developing cancer at a young age.
In San Francisco, retailers will have to make changes, regardless of the new findings. The Times reports chain stores must comply with the ordinance by Feb. 1, 2011. All other cellphone retailers have until Feb. 1, 2012. Fines will range from $100 for a first violation to $500 for the third violation and all subsequent violations within a year.
Related Resources:
- SF Mayor Calls for More Info on Cell Phone Radiation (FindLaw's Common Law)
- San Francisco to require stores to post cellphone radiation levels (Los Angeles Times)
- Phones - Cell Phones (FindLaw)
- Interphone study reports on mobile phone use and brain cancer risk (World Health Organization, via LA Times)
- Injuries from Dangerous or Defective Products (provided by Law Offices of Howard & Reed)
Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on June 24, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
Asbestos and Mesothelioma
Studies have shown that asbestos particles in the air can cause mesothelioma, lung cancer, and lung disease asbestosis, and many former and all new uses of asbestos in the U...
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Cressi Scuba Regulators Recalled Due to Risk of Drowning
Scuba Regulators Recalled Due to Risk of Drowning
1,800 Vets at Risk for HIV, Hepatitis Through VA Hospital
1,800 Vets at Risk for HIV, Hepatitis Through VA Hospital
Peanut Risk Prompts Nestle Recall
Peanut Risk Prompts Nestle Recall

Arizona: Gilbert ordinance bans home Bible studies
LA passes medical marijuana ordinance
Nebraska: Council passes adult business ordinance again
Washington: Yakima passes ordinance regulating sex shops
We Lost a Good One: 'Tanta' Succumbs to Cancer
SD: Meade adult-oriented business ordinance passes first reading









