Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Fastcase Legal News
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Fastcase Legal NewsLawsuit of the Day: The hat that launched a thousand knock-offs
By rdasgupta
R-E-S-P-E-C-T.
That is just part of what is at stake in milliner, Luke Song’s, lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on Friday, May 7. You may not know who Luke Song is, but chances are, you are familiar with one of his recent masterpieces — the hat that Aretha Franklin, wore at President Obama’s inauguration on January 20, 2009.
cc licensed flickr photo shared by howieluvzus
The hat has become so iconic that there at least three Flickr groups devoted to images of various people and cuddly pets “wearing” the hat (presumably courtesy of photo editing programs like Adobe Photoshop).
Song is suing Brasseur Inc., King Ting Millinery Co., and S&S Hat Company, Inc. for selling unauthorized copies of his creation. You can read excerpts of the complaint at The Smoking Gun and a complete copy is available via Courthouse News. Song’s complaint includes claims for trademark infringement, common law unfair competition, and breach of warranty.
Judging from the complaint, the iconic status of the hat is not lost on its creator, Mr. Song.
According to Song’s complaint, his original creation, “gained instantaneous fame and notoriety, attracting much more media attention than even Aretha Franklin’s performance itself . . .”
Ouch. We don’t doubt the hat’s cultural impact, but we would not be surprised if Ms. Franklin is not inclined to purchase any more hats from Luke Song.
Bonus: You may be interested to learn that Song’s lawsuit is not the first trademark suit filed over an iconic hat. In 1996, Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. sued Penguin Books USA, Inc., over a “Cat in the Hat”-styled parody that tells the story of the O.J. Simpson trial. Among the marks that Dr. Seuss Enterprises claimed were infringed was, “the design of the cat’s stove pipe hat.” Dr. Seuss Enter. L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc., 924 F. Supp. 1559 (S.D. Cal. 1996).
Full post as published by Fastcase Legal News on May 11, 2010 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Hydroxycut Class Action Launched
Hydroxycut Class Action Launched
Hydroxycut
Canadian Class Action Launched
Laurin Maritime et al
Class Action Launched Against Companies Responsible for Mississippi Oil Spill
Social Security Class Action Launched
to Reinstate Wrongfully Terminated Payments
Ticketmaster Class Action
Canada-wide suit launched
DHL Overcharges
Class Action Suit Launched

Bate: Drug Resistance Is Deadly
How many Lawyers does it Take to Unscrew a Light Bulb (or a Lawsuit)
Retail Therapy for Brand Owners: Counterfeit Goods & Director Liability









