ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

With High-Profile Hire, Banks Gear Up For Possible Tax-Plan Fight

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

phillipsIt’s not a role we’ve ever heard a Supreme Court litigator getting hired to do: to look into the possible constitutionality of a law before it’s passed.

But it looks like Wall Street — defined here as the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, or Sifma — is sending a preliminary shot across the bow in regard to President Obama’s plan to tax banks. The NYT reported over the weekend that Sifma had hired Sidley Austin’s Carter Phillips (pictured), one of the country’s most experienced Supreme Court litigators.

So what’s going on here? Does Phillips really need to get cranking on this now? Not necessarily, reports Bloomberg on Tuesday. The move, writes Bloomberg, “may be aimed more at swaying lawmakers than winning a lawsuit.”

D.C.-based appellate specialist Bruce Fein calls any move to challenge Obama’s plan in court “a fool’s errand.” That said, he told Bloomberg: “[T]hey might get Congress nervous, so maybe the levy wouldn't be as heavy."

So let’s play this out a bit. What might a challenge to the tax look like? Bloomberg writes that the banks could try to argue that a bank tax would be a so-called bill of attainder, or measure that singles out a certain person or group without due process, says Baker & Hostetler’s David Rivkin.

Others, like Case Western law professor Jonathan Alder, think that a bill-of-attainder would likely fail so long as it doesn't name individual companies or target a small group. "If you put that you want X dollars from a particular bank and mention it by name, that could pose a problem," Adler said.

Under Obama’s proposal, Bank of America, the biggest U.S. lender, would owe $1.53 billion a year, or 18 cents a share, while New York-based JPMorgan, the No. 2 U.S. bank, would owe $1.52 billion. The tax would amount to 22 percent of Bank of America's expected 2010 earnings per share and 12 percent of JPMorgan's, he wrote.

Photo: AP


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on January 19, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 14:16:51)