ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Houston's Clear Thinkers

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Houston's Clear Thinkers

At least tell him that he is a sacrificial lamb

By Tom Kirkendall

ADVERTISEMENTS

Department of Justice LRegular readers of this blog are familiar with the technique that federal prosecutors used in the post-Enron era to score easy convictions against businesspeople.

Threaten to go Arthur Andersen on a company, offer to let the company off the hook under a deferred prosecution agreement in return for offering up an executive or two as sacrificial lambs to be prosecuted, and then bludgeon the individual?s career, life and family into bits under the sledgehammer of the DOJ?s prosecutorial power.

Jamie Olis was arguably the first of those sacrificial lambs, and there were plenty in connection with the Enron-related prosecutions. Heck, the DOJ is even getting ready to tee up a re-trial of one such case this September.

But check out this example of DOJ brazenness that Ellen Podgor passes along. The DOJ enters into a deferred prosecution agreement with American Express and, as a part of the deal, has AE enter into a side-letter agreement that, absent the DOJ?s prior consent, prohibited AE executive Sergio Masvidal from obtaining employment with an AE unit or any company that bought the AE unit.

Given the DOJ?s heavy-handed approach in such matters, that part of the deferred prosecution agreement is not all that unusual. But one aspect of this particular deal was.

The DOJ didn?t bother to disclose the side-letter to either Masvidal or the District Court that approved the deferred prosecution agreement.

Masvidal eventually found out about it when he was denied employment by the company that bought the AE unit. So, he sued the DOJ, which eventually led to the DOJ?s issuance of the letter below, which admits that the DOJ did not disclose the side-letter to the District Court on purpose and that the DOJ?s investigation ?did not reveal any evidence that Mr. Masvidal had committed any criminal offenses or violated any banking regulations.?

Now, do you still have any doubts that the same bunch was capable of this and this?

 

 

DOJ's Clearing Letter in Sergio Masvidal Case

Full post as published by Houston's Clear Thinkers on July 07, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0032 secs (from cache 10/31/26 03:33:43)