Legal Commentary

Wasserman Schultz Must Support Taddeo

By Professor University of Miami School of Law

Daily Kos: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Still Sandbagging Taddeo.

Which reminds me: I got a robophone poll a couple of days ago which asked who I supported in the Presidential election. Then it asked what I think of Sen. Mel Martinez (I think he’s doing a terrible job).

Then the poll asked who’d I’d support in an election between Bob Graham and Martinez. I actually think Graham would be a bit old by then to be my candidate of choice, but I said I’d support him. I suppose they include him as he’s sort of the gold standard for calibrating support for Democrats in Florida state politics.

Then it got interesting: the robopollster asked who I’d support in a matchup between Martinez and Wasserman Schultz. Panic. I couldn’t of course support Martinez. After the way she’s dealt with Taddeo, and south Florida in general, I had no desire to support Wasserman Schultz in a poll. But should I say Martinez as a form of protest? Could I say Martinez?

No, I couldn’t. So I copped out and said I was undecided.

At that point the robopoll voice switched (and got much softer), as if I’d triggered something, and I got asked some demographic questions, and it was over.

Attention Debbie Wasserman Schultz: what you are doing is not costless behavior. We are taking notes, and we have long memories. And megaphones. And friends.

Full post as published by Discourse.net on August 05, 2008 (boomark / email).