ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> eLegal Canton

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: eLegal Canton

UK license plate spy cameras

By David Canton

ADVERTISEMENTS

Add this to inconsistencies I don’t understand.  Google street view often gets lambasted for privacy issues.  That happens when an individual or a car license plate is visible.  Since these street views are one time images - one only gets captured if one happens to be in view of the camera at the specific time and place it happens to be.   Privacy commissioners, including in the UK, generally want faces and license plates to be blurred. 

But the UK police get away with implementing a system where cameras log all car travel and keep records of where all cars are when they pass by each of the huge network of cameras for 2 years.  As Wired Gadget lab puts it:

UK police are on the verge of a a huge surveillance coup which will make 1984?s telescreens look as dumb and benevolent as a corner-store CCTV rig. Britain?s network of spy-cameras includes a fleet of Automatic Number Plate Recognition cams which read around 10 million license plates a day. These will soon be piped into one central computer which will compile and share this intelligence across the nation.

Remember: This isn?t being used to scan and log already suspect automobiles. It is recording the movements of every road user, whether a suspect, a criminal or an innocent traveller.

Perhaps I can understand a system that looks for license plates that the police are looking for, records that and alerts officers - but recording that info on every vehicle that passes by, and keeping it for 2 years is just wrong.  

Two basic privacy principles are that no one should collect more personal info than is necessary to do what needs to be done - and  any personal information one does have  should be kept no longer than it is needed.   I just don’t get why these principles are not applied more heavily to government collection of information.

Full post as published by eLegal Canton on May 28, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 17:06:59)