ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Economics of Contempt

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Economics of Contempt

Financial Market Bobbleheads

By Anonymous

ADVERTISEMENTS
Christopher Whalen, the managing director of a firm called Institutional Risk Analytics, is a ubiquitous commentator on financial markets. This is despite the fact that, from everything I've seen, he's totally crazy. Par for the course when it comes to financial market bobbleheads, I suppose.

I expect financial market bobbleheads to exhibit a certain amount of craziness?after all, the shows they appear on are aimed at retail investors, and they're just trying to make headlines. But Whalen's claim that Tim Geithner is "too close to Goldman Sachs" is Ben Stein-level crazy. From an interview with Yahoo Finance:

"I believe Tim Geithner only represents part of Wall Street - Goldman Sachs," [Whalen] says, suggesting Goldman was the "primary beneficiary of the AIG bailout" and notes Goldman alum Stephen Friedman serves on the board of the NY Fed.
When the interviewer stated, "effectively, your argument is that Tim Geithner is in bed with Goldman Sachs," Whalen responded, "I believe so."

Nevermind that Geithner has never worked for Goldman, or any Wall Street institution for that matter. No evidence required. This is Yahoo Finance.

The only thing resembling evidence Whalen cites (other than a rumor about Geithner spending time on the phone with Robert Rubin that Whalen actually started himself) is "the reporting in the New York Times about the AIG bailout," by which he means the preposterous?and thoroughly discredited?article by Gretchen Morgenson. Morgenson effectively asserted that the Fed's decision to bail out AIG was improperly influenced by Goldman, which is idiotic for a number of reasons, but especially because the Fed hired Morgan Stanley to advise them on the AIG bailout. No mention of this in the Times article, of course, because we can't let pesky facts get in the way of a good Goldman conspiracy theory.

What is it about Goldman Sachs that drives the Ben Steins and Chris Whalens of the world so crazy? Honestly, I've never understood it.

Full post as published by Economics of Contempt on January 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:28:33)