ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

Feds Stifle Research, But Support for Pot Decriminalization Grows

By Jonathan H. Adler

ADVERTISEMENTS

Many doctors and patients believe there are many legitimate medical uses for marijuana, yet there is relatively little serious scientific evidence to support such claims, particularly as concerns smoking it.  One reason for this could be that the federal government makes it so difficult ? indeed, virtually impossible ? to conduct scientific research on marijuana?s potential medical benefits, as today?s NYT reports.

Lyle E. Craker, a professor of plant sciences at the University of Massachusetts, has been trying to get permission from federal authorities for nearly nine years to grow a supply of the plant that he could study and provide to researchers for clinical trials.

But the Drug Enforcement Administration ? more concerned about abuse than potential benefits ? has refused, even after the agency?s own administrative law judge ruled in 2007 that Dr. Craker?s application should be approved, and even after Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in March ended the Bush administration?s policy of raiding dispensers of medical marijuana that comply with state laws.

?All I want to be able to do is grow it so that it can be tested,? Dr. Craker said in comments echoed by other researchers.

Marijuana is the only major drug for which the federal government controls the only legal research supply and for which the government requires a special scientific review.

Despite these limitations, fourteen states have legalized the medicinal use of marijuana, most recently New Jersey. Some are even beginning to debate going further and decriminalizing marijuana altogether.  States? fiscal woes are only likely to reinforce this trend as legislators consider the potential revenue stream taxing legal marijuana could provide.

The WSJ editorial page was pathologically hostile to any discussion of drug legalization under the late Bob Bartley.  Under Paul Gigot, however, the Journal has broadened its range of published opinions and has even begun to publish the occasional pro-decriminalization op-ed piece.  The most recent was this piece last week by a New Jersey psychiatrist.  Could a call for decriminalization from within GOP ranks be far behind?


Copyright © 2010
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)

Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on January 19, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.007 secs (from cache 10/31/26 18:08:59)