ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Discriminations

Equality: It?s Good Politics

ADVERTISEMENTS

A few days ago, as I noted here, Mickey Kaus argued that McCain ?could get right with GOP conservatives and virtually guarantee his nomination? if he would do one thing: ?Promise that he won't press for his ?comprehensive immigration reform? legislation during his first term.? I then added:

Here?s another thing that would work just about as well, and better if done in conjunction with the Border Promise: announce his strong support of the civil rights initiatives barring racial preferences that are likely to be on the November 2008 ballot in five states, including his home state of Arizona. Such a move would neutralize the support Giuliani has received (and deserved) from enlisting Ward Connerly as one of his delegate candidates in California.
There he goes again. Now Mickey is back, explaining ?How Obama Can Win.? Noting that ?the idea that Obama has been ?ghettoized? as the ?black? candidate has become the accepted template for the campaign ? even the point that a win in hotly contested South Carolina on Saturday is seen as actually hurting Obama? (citing the Dick Morris argument I mentioned here), Mickey suggests a way out of the racial trap the Clintons? have set: the ?obvious move,? he writes, ?is to find a Sister Souljah ? after Saturday ? to stiff arm.? And, he continues,
[t]he most promising candidate is not a person, but an idea: race-based affirmative action. Obama has already made noises about shifting to a class-based, race-blind system of preferences. What if he made that explicit? Wouldn't that shock hostile white voters into taking a second look at his candidacy? He'd renew his image as trans-race leader (and healer). The howls of criticism from the conventional civil-rights establishment ? they'd flood the cable shows ? would provide him with an army of Souljahs to hold off. If anyone noticed Hillary in the ensuing fuss, it would be to put her on the spot--she'd be the one defending mend-it-don't-end-it civil rights orthodoxy.
Even though I?m on record (this is a record, isn?t it?) with doubts about Obama?s willingness or ability to endorse the principle of colorblind ?without regard? equality (see, for starters, here, here, here, here, here, and here), I think Mickey?s recommendation is a good one. I wish Obama would accept it.

Imagine that! Advocating colorblind equality would be good politics, for both Democrats and Republicans. Must be something inherently American about the idea.

Full post as published by Discriminations on January 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/05/26 17:05:38)