Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Glorfindel of Gondolin
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: Glorfindel of GondolinClinton vs. Obama on telecom immunity
In a few days I'll post the reasons why I think Barack Obama, not Hillary Clinton, should be the democratic presidential nominee. For now, please note what happened today.
I'm not talking about the potomac primary, I'm talking about the vote in the Senate to strip retroactive immunity from civil liability for telecom companies that cooperated with the Bush administration's illegal wiretapping of American citizens without a warrant.
A "yea" vote was a vote to strip the immunity, and hold telecoms accountable when they act illegally. A "nay" vote was a capitulation to the Bush administration's rule by fiat, and a vote against the rule of law.
Yea: Barack Obama
Nay: John McCain
Absent: Hillary Clinton
Ever the proud champion of principle, Hillary doesn't actively capitulate to her opponents. She passively capitulates.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Full post as published by Glorfindel of Gondolin on February 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Is Obama a Natural Born Citien?
Philip J. Berg, Esquire vs. Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barack Dunham, a/k/a Barry Dunham, et al
Telecom Settlement
Ericsson settles $30 million lawsuit.
Media/Telecom
consumer rights involving print, radio, television, video, DVD, video games, and mobile telephones.

Senate Supports Telecom Immunity in Spy Suits
New on LLRX.com - Commentary: Congress and Immunity for Telecom Eavesdropping
Senate Votes to Give Immunity to Telecom Companies: Hillary Clinton Skips Vote
Call the Senate Judiciary Committee and Demand Leadership - No Telecom Immunity!
Rockefeller Endorses Obama: Now About Telecom Immunity
Support the House in the Last Stand Against Telecom Immunity! (phone)







