Labor & Employment Law
: Massachusetts Employment Law BlogCan you be terminated just prior to vesting in your benefits?
By Michael Goldstein, Esq. (all)
The Court held that the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is violated when an employer terminates an at-will employee without good cause and deprives the employee of a clearly identifiable future compensation reflective of the employee?s past services. Fortune v. Nat’l Cash Register Co., 373 Mass. 96, 104-05 (1977).Whether particular benefits relate to past or future services is a matter of law to be decided by the court where the contract terms agreed to by the parties are undisputed. Sargent v. Tenaska, Inc., 108 F.3d 5, 8 (1997). A cause of action might exist for an employee at will who was terminated in bad faith one month before his partial interest in a five year project was scheduled to vest. Id. Where benefits such as shares of stock are subject to a vesting schedule over time and vest only if the employee continues to be employed, such benefits are contingent on the employee providing future services for the employer and thus are generally not compensation for past services. Harrison v. NetCentric Corp., 433 Mass. at 473-474 (2001).
The Supreme Judicial Court has recognized an exception to the general rule allowing for termination of an at-will employee with or without cause, which states that an employer may not terminate an at-will employee ?if the termination violates a clearly established public policy.? King v. Driscoll, 418 Mass. 576, 582 (1994); Wright v. Shriner’s Hosp. for Crippled Children, 412 Mass. 469, 472 (1992). The determination of whether a ?public policy? is implicated in the discharge of an employee is a question of law for the court. ?It is not for the jury to define the public policy. The judge must determine whether, on the evidence, there is a basis for finding that a well-defined, important public policy has been violated.? Mello v. Stop & Shop. Co., 402 Mass. 555, 561(1988).
Full post as published by Massachusetts Employment Law Blog on April 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Denial of Health Benefits Arbitrary and Capricious, Lacking Specificity
Yesterday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided Summers v. Touchpoint Health Plan Inc...
Labor Law Class Action Defense Cases-Schachter v. Citigroup: California State Court Affirms Summary Judgment In Favor Of Defense In Labor Law Class Action Challenging Forfeiture Provisions Of Voluntary Employee Incentive Compensation Plan
Defense Motion for Summary Judgment in Labor Law Class Action Properly Granted because Employee Incentive Compensation Plan did not Violate California law by Providing for Forfeiture of Stock for Following Resignation or Termination for Cause During Plan’s Two-Year Vesting Period California State Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action against their employer, Citigroup, alleging violations of California’s Labor Code; specifically, the class action alleged that the financial brokerage company’s voluntary incentive compensation plan - which “allows participants the option of using a portion of their annual earnings to purchase shares in the company's stock at a price below the stock's publicly-traded market price” but provides further that “[i]f the participating employee resigns or is terminated for cause within a two-year vesting period, the employee forfeits the stock as well as the money used to purchase it” - violates California law because the money used to purchase the shares were wages and their forfeiture constituted a conversion of wages...
Discontinuing Section 207-c benefits
Discontinuing Section 207-c benefitsJ. Patrick Burns v Town of Clarkstown, App. Div...
Employee terminated for violating employer?s written policy ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits
Matter of Pagan v Commissioner of Labor, 2008 NY Slip Op 06414, Decided on July 24, 2008, Appellate Division, Third Department The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified Juan Pagan for unemployment insurance benefits following his termination for accepting a designation...
Alleghany County, PA Considering Community Benefits Agreement Local Laws
As first reported on the Community Benefits Agreement Blog, two proposals dealing with community benefits agreements (CBAs) were the subject of a public hearing a few weeks ago in Alleghany County, Pennsylvania...
Trust Provision interpreting distribution to someone who dies before distribution is complete.
Bryan v.Dethlefs, 959 So. 2d 314 (FIa. 3d DCA May 16, 2007) The decedent?s trust stated, "Upon my death, the then balance of principal and accumulated income remaining in the trust fund shall be distributed to my grandson, Robert R...
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 3
Other Benefits
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 4
Where to get help
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 2
Training, Healthcare, and Death Benefits
ERISA Pension Benefits after Termination
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Can my employer threaten me with termination if I don't seek a transfer to another department?
In many jurisdictions, employees are "at will". This means that their employmen...
How to collect a personal loan from a spouse?
You local court will probably have someone to offer you some assistance as you p...
How to prove child support payments were sent by US Mail?
Your best bet is to send the checks via certified mail return receipt requested....
How can an employer defend themselves for firing an employee who contends the company exposed him to hazardardous atmospheres although medical testing has been negative?
You'll need to contact OSHA to determine your responsibility as far as the work ...
How are social security death benefits split between multiple surviving spouses?
Both would receive the same benefit amount, without either being reduced from wh...
Social Security Class Action Launched
to Reinstate Wrongfully Terminated Payments
Social Security Loses Class Action, Will Pay $500 Million in Benefits
Social Security Loses Class Action, Will Pay $500 Million in Benefits
Spa Factor
Aromatherapy Fountain & Bath Benefits Kits Recalled
Georgette Klinger Spa
alleging unpaid wages and benefits and violation of the WARN Act.
The Dannon Company, Inc.
allegedly falsely claimed Activia and DanActive probiotic yogurt products had scientifically proven health benefits.
Immigrant SSI
US Federal Government agrees to extend benefits in class action settlement.

Can my employer threaten me with termination if I don't seek a transfer to another department?
In many jurisdictions, employees are "at will". This means that their employmen...
How to collect a personal loan from a spouse?
You local court will probably have someone to offer you some assistance as you p...
How to prove child support payments were sent by US Mail?
Your best bet is to send the checks via certified mail return receipt requested....
How can an employer defend themselves for firing an employee who contends the company exposed him to hazardardous atmospheres although medical testing has been negative?
You'll need to contact OSHA to determine your responsibility as far as the work ...
How are social security death benefits split between multiple surviving spouses?
Both would receive the same benefit amount, without either being reduced from wh...








