Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Wage & Hour - Development & HighlightsThree Strikes And You're Out (Or, In, The Class Action)e
By Mark E. Tabakman, Esq.
Food vendors at Fenway Park in Boston have filed a class action against Aramark Sports LLC, their employer, alleging that the company assessed service charges and then did not pay the service charges out to the employees. The suit also claims improper payment of overtime.
The service charges are added on to anyone buying food at the ballpark. The workers are paid their hourly wages, but are not given any of the service charge proceeds; the suit charges that this is "unjust enrichment" to the Company. The suit also alleges that the Company did not pay wages timely, did not properly calculate overtime and docked employees for breaks they did not take.
The suit was filed in state court, but the Company lawyers have sought to remove it to federal court, based on the theory that this suit is preempted by federal labor law, meaning that the suit is based on interpretations of labor contracts and therefore should not be in a court. The Company also maintains that as the suit would seek to include more than 100 people, the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 mandates that the action be heard in federal court. This fairly new law provides that federal courts have jurisdiction over any class action that involves more than 100 workers and the alleged amount at issue exceeds $5,000,000 must be brought in federal court.
There have been a number of these service charge/tip cases working their way through the courts. The recent Starbucks case, that I reported on a few weeks ago, involved similar allegations. Where a service charge assessed to customers is advertised by the Company (or restaurant) as a "gratuity" or where the company indicates that these service charges will be distributed to employees and they are not, that forms the basis for a lawsuit (and bad employee relations).
Change up or fast ball? We'll see.
Full post as published by Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights on April 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement
Settlement Reached in Female Athletes' Class Action
Slippery Rock University Settles Discrimination Class Action
GE Reitrement Class Action Settled
GE $40 Million Settlement Agreed in Retirement Class Action
Environmental Class Action to Proceed Against DuPont
DuPont New Jersey Drinking Water Contamination Class Action to Proceed
Class Action Filed Over Incontinence Briefs
Arizona Health Care Faces Federal Class Action over Incontinence Briefs

Blind Strikes and Double Strikes
New Mexico Supreme Court strikes down class-action ban
Another Court Strikes Down Class Action Ban In Arbitration Agreement







