ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employer cannot make unauthorized deductions

ADVERTISEMENTS

Employer cannot make unauthorized deductions
Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/

Reproduced with permission. Copyright © 2008, Mitchell H. Rubinstein, Esq., Adjunct Professor of Law, St. Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.

State labor law is often an overlook body of employment law as Pachter v. Bernard Hodes Group, ___N.Y. 3d___(June 10, 2008), a NYS Court of Appeals decision, demonstrates. This case involves two certified questions from the 2d Circuit. After a Vice-President, who elected to be paid via sales commissions left his employ, a dispute arose as to whether certain deductions could be made from his paycheck. Section 193 of the New York Labor Law prohibits unauthorized deductions. What made the decision difficult was that there was a question whether "executives" were within the definition of employee. The court holds that they are. As the Court stated:

Hodes argues that, despite the broad definition of "employee" in subdivision (2) of Labor Law § 190, the term is modified by the language in subdivisions (5), (6) and (7) that excludes individuals employed in executive capacities. We disagree. It is evident from the text and structure of article 6 of the Labor Law that executives are employees within the meaning of Labor Law § 190 (2). Although executives are removed from the definitions of certain subcategories of employees in Labor Law § 190 (5), (6) and (7), those provisions are not intended to limit the scope of who qualifies as an "employee" under subdivision (2). Rather, their purpose is to eliminate executives from particular requirements in article 6, such as the frequency of wage payments to manual workers, railroad workers, commission salespersons and clerical or other workers (see Labor Law § 191).

The second issue concerned when a commission was earned and became a wage. The court held that in the absence of a written instrument, a commission becomes a wage as determined by the parties express or implied agreement, or if no agreement exists by the default common law rule that ties the earning of a commission to the employees production of a ready, willing and able purchaser.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

[Observation: It is often said that although not all public employees are public officers, all public officers are public employees.]

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on June 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:03:08)