Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Wage & Hour - Development & HighlightsConditional Certification Defeated: A Rare Occurrence!
By Mark Tabakman
A federal judge has thrown a nationwide collective action against Black & Decker out of court. The suit alleged that the company did not pay employees for time allegedly worked off the clock. The court found that the plaintiff did not prove that he had worked overtime. The case is entitled Kuebel v. Black and Decker (U.S.) Inc. and was filed in the federal district court in the Western District of New York. There could have been more than 200 employees involved.
This is a rare occurrence. The granting of so-called conditional certification is usually a fairly easy hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome. A few affidavits, perhaps some deposition testimony and that's it. The key remains that some showing of similarity must be made, some showing that an overall policy or practice applied to all of the employees potentially involved. That this plaintiff could not make the showing is significant.
The court found that the plaintiff 'has not explained when and for how long he performed the off-the-clock work.' The court continued and stated that ' because the undisputed facts demonstrate that plaintiff has failed to meet his burden, his claim for off-the-clock work fail as a matter of law.'
What is interesting in the context of this particular case is that the company had stipulated to the conditional certification of a class that was solely confined to the company policy of paying retail specialists for travel time, but only if the employee's commute was more than sixty miles or sixty minutes. The judge had found this policy legal in May 2009. (Note: Home-to-work travel is always non-compensable, so a company can legally implement a policy of paying for some component of this travel time if it so desires).
This does not often happen and that is why I write about it when it does. The lesson for employers, on the merits of the controversy, is that they must never direct employees to do productive work off-the-clock and should have a policy in place relating to that issue. Also, maintain accurate records of employee working time and, most importantly, have employees self-certify their working time (e.g. sign off on time card) every week. That is the employer's fail-safe, best protection against such suits.
Full post as published by Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights on May 19, 2010 (boomark / email).
EB-1 and EB-2 Visa Status
Obtaining a Green Card Without Going Through the Labor Certification Process
Jewelry Television
alleging treated gemstones were advertised as "extremely rare" and "all natural".









