Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Open and Shut
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Open and ShutOnly a glimpse of Victorian food hygiene standards
Mark Russell in The Sunday Age reports "The veil of secrecy protecting Melbourne's restaurants and cafes caught dishing up contaminated food will be lifted next year. The State Government expects a "name and shame" food hygiene website to be up and running by July 1. The website will be similar to one in NSW that has attracted more than 2.3 million visitors since its launch a year ago."
The veil however won't be lifted as much as it should, or as much as it has in NSW, despite the claim by a spokeswoman for the Minister for Health that the Food Amendment (Regulation Reform) Bill currently before the Parliament will deliver the goods. The Bill ( Clause 27) will require the publication on a website of convictions for offences, which of course are court imposed, and while this would provide convenient access, only involves information that is already in the public domain. What is different about the NSW Register is that it also includes information about penalty infringement notices issued after council or Food Authority inspections. These are not convictions, but represent findings that may or may not be disputed. The Victorian Bill (Clause 39) provides for infringement notices to be issued but makes no provision for inclusion of notices issued on a publicly available register.
Last week the NSW Authority went a step further than the NSW Act requires in releasing in response to a Freedom of Information application, details of the number of inspections undertaken, providing for the first time a list of of those councils which don't appear to attach a priority to this aspect of regulatory responsibility.
On my reading, Victoria is following a Western Australian lead in only mandating publication of the register of convictions. A more serious effort to lift hygiene standards would involve opening up the inspection regime to public scrutiny by ensuring publication of results of all inspections (good as well as poor findings), any enforcable undertakings (Clause 34) entered into, and penalty infringement notices and convictions, with scope for the proprietor to add information about rectification of identified problems.
Full post as published by Open and Shut on July 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Pet Food Recall
Diamond Pet Food sets up $3.1 million class action fund for substandard dog food.
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.
PETCO
Animal Food Distribution Unsanitary, Food Seized
Menu Food
$240,000 settlement reached in Hawaii class action contaminated pet food suit.
Food Dyes Linked to Behavioral Problems
Ban Urged
Mars Petcare
Recalls Dry Pet Food Manufactured at Everson PA Plant

Chinese authorities vow to ensure food safety as new law goes effective (People's Daily)
Making restaurant selection easy: website launch in UK city reveals hygiene scores
Prisoner Plaintiff Stated Cause of Action Based on Prison's Depriving Him of Hygiene Items
More on Corey ... sorry, I mean more on "a Victorian teenager" ...
New Food Safety Law Effective this Month
FDA Considering Stricter Produce Standards







