Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Lenz Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Lenz BlogWorking Group Opinion on Search Engines
By Karl-Friedrich Lenz
As noted at EU Law Blog, the EU Working Group on Data Protection has published an opinion on data protection law regarding search engines.
They say that the Surveillance Directive (data retention Directive 2006/24) does not give search engines any rights to store search histories, because these are not traffic data, but content of the communication, which may not be retained under Art. 5 (2).
I agree with this result.
However, a search engine is retaining contents of a communication of which it is a party. If someone sends a query to Yahoo, they are not using Yahoo to convey a signal to a third party. They are conveying the signal to Yahoo. Therefore, as the opinion noted correctly, the 2002 telecommunications data protection Directive is not applicable to search engines. That means that the 2006 Surveillance Directive is not applicable either, since that Directive amends the 2002 Directive.
Full post as published by Lenz Blog on April 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
MCM Construction Pollution
$6 million payout for using outdated, polluting diesel engines
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Canadian Government
seeks new law enabling them to search your laptop
Meta Financial Group, Inc CASH Securities Fraud
Meta Financial Group, Inc CASH
Two Kentucky Counties
settle strip search class action lawsuits

6 months is enough, Article 29 Working Group tells search engines
European Privacy Rules Apply to Search Engines
Privacy and Search Engines like Google: Opinion of Art. 29 Working Party
Best Sites for Identifying Search Engines








