ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> IP Dragon

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: IP Dragon

Words Less Spoken about Copyright Piracy in China

ADVERTISEMENTS
Much ado about copyright piracy in China. Liu Baijia wrote about China's measures against copyright infringement in the article 'Taking action against piracy' for China Daily.

Many familiar arguments can be read here: about on the one hand China's great speed of implementing IP legislation, where China needed only 20 years, other countries needed 100 years; and on the other that foreign countries need to be patient, because China has just begun in this field of enforcement.

But a novel way to write about the subject matter can also be found in the article; a defence against a complaint nobody but intellectual property infringers would make:

"We cannot criticize this dual protection on one hand for the government's interference and on the other hand say the government should take more responsibility[..]." I think the role of government; protecting and enforcing law, including intellectual property rights, is not controversially, using the administrative enforcement route included.

A reason for the lack of enforcement by the National Copyright Administration of China (NAC), that remains unwritten in the article, is the NAC' undercapacity. The NAC is staffed with only 200 people! (see page 46 of Paper Tiger or Roaring Dragon, China's TRIPs Implementations and Enforcement).

Liu Baijiu writes: "In April, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued a joint interpretation, sharply lowering the threshold for criminal charges against piracy set three years ago. According to the rule, organizations and individuals selling 500 pirated discs, instead of 1,000 in the 2004 rule, can receive a three year sentence, while those selling 2,500 copies can be sent to prison for seven years."

However, one can argue as Joseph Simone, partner of Baker & McKenzie in Hong Kong, rightly does, that the threshold of 500 pirated disks is much too high. In this constellation infringers can sell 499 pirated disks in batches, so they will stay below the threshold.

The writer also gives information about the confiscated pirated goods. However, these statistics can never alone give a relevant picture about whether China's enforcement is adequate. One needs the statistics about the infringement levels aswell. Read about my proposal for the use of the Enforcement/Infringement Ratio here.

Read Liu Baijia's article here.

Full post as published by IP Dragon on October 29, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/04/26 09:15:33)