ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> European Law Network

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: European Law Network

Submission 3/2008 by Guilaume FABRE and Daniel CREVEL-SANDER

By jcdw

ADVERTISEMENTS

?L?arrêt BUPA du TPI du 14 février 2008 et la mise en ?uvre des principes posés dans l?arrêt Altmark?

Abstract

The BUPA case gave an opportunity to the CFI to revisit the Altmark criteria on whether a compensation for obligations of services of general economic interest amounts to state aid.

The case concerned a scheme pursuant to which public services obligations were imposed to all operators on the Irish private health insurance market, with a system for compensation between the various operators. In light of the peculiar nature of the scheme at issue, the CFI made a teleological interpretation of the Altmark criteria, based on the spirit and purpose which prevailed in the Altmark case.

In particular, the third Altmark condition, concerning the calculation of the compensation could not be applied. The fourth Altmark condition was also inapplicable, for lack of any undertaking to use as a benchmark. The CFI was however satisfied that both conditions were met by reference to their spirit and purpose, in particular in light of the need to preserve the sovereign choice of Ireland on the organisation of its health insurance system. Finally, and although the CFI examined each condition separately, it used constant cross references from the application of one Altmark condition to other Altmark conditions. This creates the impression that it wished to return to a more comprehensive, all-encompassing analysis of compensation schemes, such as the approach that had prevailed in the Ferring case. The parallel drawn by the Tribunal throughout its analysis of the Altmark criteria with the application of Article 86 EC further supports this view.

All in all, the approach of the CFI suggests a move towards a relaxation in the application of the Altmark criteria, opening the door to a way back to a more pragmatic, Ferring like, approach of the compensation for obligations of services of general economic interest.

Download the article ?L?arrêt BUPA du TPI du 14 février 2008 et la mise en ?uvre des principes posés dans l?arrêt Altmark? here (FR)

Full post as published by European Law Network on April 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.7639 secs (new cache)