ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

The Risks of Risk management

ADVERTISEMENTS
Set of 52 Anglo-American style playing cards

Image via Wikipedia

Paul Wilmott has an instructive piece on why risk can mean much more than statistical risk.

"We have learned the hard way how important it is to measure and manage risk.

Despite the thousands of mathematics and science PhDs working in risk management nowadays we seem to be at greater financial and economic risk than ever before. To show you one important side of banking I would like you to follow me in an exercise with parallels in risk management.

You are in the audience at a small, intimate theatre, watching a magic show. The magician hands a pack of cards to a random member of the audience, asks him to check that it is an ordinary pack, and to give it a shuffle.

The magician turns to another member of the audience and asks her to name a card at random. "Ace of Hearts," she says. Pick a card, any card The magician covers his eyes, reaches out to the pack of cards, and after some fumbling around he pulls out a card.

The question to you is what is the probability of the card being the Ace of Hearts?"

Wilmott has some good answers, but I cannot tell whether he is making the claim that most of the risk underlying say a particular derivative are non mathematical, and that we cannot even hope for an actuarial science of risk. In his particular example, Bayesians could always come up with the right answer based upon what they picked as the underlying probability distribution.

For example, one answer to the Wilmott question is that the answer is zero, because the fumbling of the magician reveals that he is pretending not to be very good, and he is setting up the audience for finding the Ace of Hearts somewhere else.

If you have seen this trick before, this is a perfectly good answer. But if you haven't seen this trick before, the answer of zero will strike you as off-base or somehow deeply wrong.

I think that the overall point Wilmott is making is the exercise of risk taking involves making bets about things that you may not have seen before - events that cannot be treated as if they were the result of many sided dice.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on December 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/04/26 16:31:52)