Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> China Law Blog

International Law

: China Law Blog

Obama And Geithner On China. Elecfion Hangover Or The Way Things Will Be?

By Dan Harris and Steve Dickinson

James Fallows writes an interesting piece, entitled, "Broader point about Geithner, Obama, China, and 'manipulation'" setting out his concerns on how the Obama administration is treating/going to treat China. To summarize what Fallows says (and hey, if I am not summarizing it properly, go ahead and attribute it to me) is that Obama is clearly capable of nuance. The key financial and diplomatic people Obama has brought into his administration are clearly capable of nuance (i.e. Geithner, Hillary Clinton, et. al.). Obama and his people have done a good job so far in recognizing the complexity of the issues facing the administration, and in seeking to formulate practical solutions to resolve those issues. But here is where the disconnect starts. During the election campaign, Obama's expressed views on China were both simplistic and jingoistic. For examples of this, check out the following: -- Barack Obama On China. Say It Ain't So . . . .Oh But It Is. -- Obama And Clinton And China As Though It Actually Matters. But the accepted view on Obama's less than enlightened comments regarding China was either that he did not really believe what he was saying or that once elected, he would study up on the issues, apply his intellect to them, and start sounding more like George F. Kennan than Sarah Palin. But with the recent needlessly antagonistic comments about China by the Obama administration, Fallows and I (or maybe it is just me) are starting to wonder when the eduction of Obama on China will kick in. Now mind you, I am NOT criticizing the Obama administration regarding its China policy, but I am criticizing it for crossing China without any good reason for doing so. What do you think?

Full post as published by China Law Blog on January 25, 2009 (boomark / email).