ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> India Law & Tech

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: India Law & Tech

First Impressions on the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010

By Apar Gupta

ADVERTISEMENTS
Vectorization of Tom Bell's graph, which shows...
Image via Wikipedia

Thanks to PRS Legislative the Copyright Act Amendment Bill, 2009 is finally online. While glancing through the bill I noticed four provisions which can have direct impact on electronic commerce. The first two are exceptions from Copyright Liability where provisions have been inserted to further shield intermediaries. Here, Sec. 52(1)(b) contains a standard exception from liability in cases of transient and incidental storage of a work. Sec. 52(1)(c)  which will apply to online service providers is more intresting contemplates a notice a takedown provision. The section has the requirment of a court order within 14 days of the orignal complaint from the rights owner to maintain the continued prevention of the delivery of the alleged infringing content.

In the continuing tradition of balance in the copyright universe the next two provisions create liability. However, I get a sense they go a bit further. These two provisions relate to protection of ?technological measures? and ?rights management information?. For the violation of both these provisions, the sanctions are criminal. With the insertion of Sec.65(b), the circumvention of any technological measure to protect rights under the copyright act will be an offence carrying a penalty of imprisonment for 2 years. There are important limitations to this section as firstly the circumvention should be with an intention of infringment of the statutory rights and secondly the section will only apply for infringment of statutory rights and not contractual rights. Hence with the second limitation will be inapplicable with respect to the extended rights which are usually contained in software licenses.

The second section which is inserted is more problematic in my opinion as Sec. 65(b) which reads as protection of rights management information. Alongwith the section defintiion clause 2(xa) is also bieng inserted, which defines ?rights management information?, as ?(I) title of the work; (2) name of the author; (3) the name and the address of the owner of the rights; (4) terms and conditions regarding the use of the rights?.  Here any person removing or altering the rights management information will be liable for the 2 year imprisonment. Hence, the section seeks to extend the rights of idenitification and ownership while providing for penalties in itself. There are no exceptions under this section and it applies absolutely. In my view this section will generate considerable litigation.

For those who are intrested in reading the bill, click here.

Full post as published by India Law & Tech on May 03, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0037 secs (from cache 10/31/26 12:39:18)